that if they engage in sodomy they're in peril of contracting a whole host of vile diseases and may not be around to see who wins the Global Warming debate.  Kids have a right to know that there are inherent risks in anal intercourse that cannot be made safe. 

Granted, precautions can be taken to make some sexual practices safer, but not completely safe.  Many teens don't bother with safety measures, which leads to disastrous consequences.  And let's get real.  Your average teenager has no desire to learn about "anal health."  They have bigger fish to fry.  This is where parents and teachers come in.  Parents should be fully informed about risky sex.  Hard as it is, they MUST talk to their kids about it.  Teachers have the responsibility to teach the whole truth to their students, even if the "gay" activist groups ridicule and threaten them.  Just suck it up - and do the right thing.

I find it odd that radical "gay"activist groups like Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (GLSEN) will berate anyone who dares to speak out against sodomy when they know perfectly well that it's unhealthy.  Especially for teens who aren't aware of the ends and outs of anal sex. 

GLSEN shouts from the roof tops that it's OK to be "gay." Fine.  But as a notable "education" network, the moral thing, the noble thing, for GLSEN to do is to educate teens that risk of trauma, blood infection, and viruses like hepatitas C are inherent to sodomy. 

GLSEN wants "gay" and lesbian students protected from harassment and demand that government school employees enroll in "sensitivity training."  (Sensitivity training aims to intimidate and silence anyone who disagrees with a homosexual's choices.) GLSEN is also pushing for "anti-gay harassment" classes in middle school and high school. 

GLSEN has one thing right.  Harassment of anyone for any reason is wrong.  It's also wrong to deliberately withhold vital information from the public.  Yet "gay" activist groups avoid giving in-depth explanations of diseases that teens will be exposed to.  Hence, teens are playing Russian Roulette with their lives. Why not lay out the truth and leave it up to the individual to decide if the "gay" lifestyle is all it's cracked up to be? If that's the road a person chooses to go down, he or she will walk it with their eyes wide open.
It's far from politically correct to say anything against the homosexual lifestyle.  But guess what?  The data proves that many homosexuals like living on the edge!  According to a 2005 study conducted by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) on HIV-related high risk behavior,

"At the end of 2004, approximately 500,000 persons were living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the 35 U.S. areas with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting since 2000. Certain behaviors (e.g., unprotected sexual intercourse and injection-drug use) are associated with high risk for HIV transmission. Through 2004, of all cases of HIV infection in the United States reported to CDC, 34% were attributed to male-male sexual contact, 14% to injection-drug use, and 20% to heterosexual contact."  [2]

Sadly, HIV infection among men who have sex with men is rising in the U.S and Canada. It's also rising in the UK. "Last year there were more new diagnoses among gay men than ever before.  While that may be partly due to more men coming forward for testing, it is feared that the gay community is indulging in high-risk sexual behaviour and failing to use condoms. Other sexually transmitted diseases, such as syphilis and gonorrhoea, are

Next page...

Prints 1 page at a time                         Home   |   Email   |  Up